Research output per year
Research output per year
Search results
-
2020
Demonstrating reliability through transparency: a scientific validity framework to assist scientists and lawyers in criminal proceedings
Carr, S., Piasecki, E. & Gallop, A., 1 Mar 2020, Forensic Science International, 308 6 p.Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Special issue
Open AccessFile -
2018
Clarifying the ‘reliability’ continuum and testing its limits: biometric (fingerprint and DNA) expert evidence
Carr, S., Gallop, A., Piasecki, E., Tully, G. & Wilson, T. J., 30 Nov 2018, Forensic Science Evidence and Expert Witness Testimony: Reliability Through Reform?. Roberts, P. & Stockdale, M. (eds.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, p. 155-183 29 p.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
-
Demonstrating Reliability and Directing Scrutiny: a framework to assist scientists and lawyers
Piasecki, E., Carr, S., Tully, G. & Gallop, A., 30 Aug 2018.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper
-
Duties of the Expert Witness: R v Pabon [2018] EWCA Crim 420
Carr, S. & Piasecki, E., 1 Apr 2018, In: The Journal of Criminal Law. 82, 2, p. 113-116 4 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Northumbria University Centre for Evidence and Criminal Justice Studies (NCECJS) – Written evidence (FRS0038)
Wilson, T. J., Stockdale, M., Jackson, A., Carr, S., Davies, G. & Piasecki, E., 14 Sep 2018, House of Lords Science and Technology Committee, 6 p.Research output: Working paper
Open Access -
Re-examining the ‘reliability’ of forensic pathology evidence
Wilson, T. J., Jackson, A., Gallop, A. & Piasecki, E., 30 Nov 2018, Forensic Science Evidence and Expert Witness Testimony: Reliability through Reform?. Roberts, P. & Stockdale, M. (eds.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, p. 184-212Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
-
Science and Justice Research Interest Group (RIG), Northumbria University - written evidence to the Science and Technology Committee (Lords) inquiry on forensic science (FRS0051)
McCartney, C., Evison, M., Ward, T., Wortley, N., Piasecki, E., Nsiah Amoako, E., Amankwaa, A. & Jackson, A., 14 Sep 2018, 10 p. London : House of Lords Science and Technology Committee.Research output: Other contribution
Open AccessFile24 Downloads (Pure) -
Science Friction: Streamlined Forensic Reporting, Reliability and Justice
Edmond, G., Carr, S. & Piasecki, E., 1 Dec 2018, In: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 38, 4, p. 764-792 28 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
2017
Brexit and the Law School
Noto La Diega, G., Carr, S., Davies, G., Dunn, R., Jackson, A. & Piasecki, E., 10 Jul 2017, p. 1-3. 3 p.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper
Open AccessFile21 Downloads (Pure) -
2016
Article 8 ECHR and the Disclosure of Criminal Records: Time to Reconsider
Davies, G. & Piasecki, E., 7 Dec 2016, In: The Journal of Criminal Law. 80, 6, p. 399-402Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
No More Laissez Faire? Expert Evidence, Rule Changes and Reliability: Can More Effective Training for the Bar and Judiciary Prevent Miscarriages of Justice?
Davies, G. & Piasecki, E., 1 Oct 2016, In: The Journal of Criminal Law. 80, 5, p. 327-343Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
Opening the Scientific Experts Black Box: ‘Critical Trust’ as a Reformative Principle in Criminal Evidence
Carr, S., Piasecki, E., Tully, G. & Wilson, T., Oct 2016, In: The Journal of Criminal Law. 80, 5, p. 364-386 23 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
The future of advocacy training in respect of expert evidence. No more ‘laissez-faire’?
Davies, G., Jackson, A. & Piasecki, E., 24 Jun 2016.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper
-
Written evidence from the NCECJS to the HoC Justice Committee: implications of Brexit for justice
Wilson, T., Stockdale, M., Jackson, A., Carr, S., Davies, G., Johnson, D. & Piasecki, E., 29 Nov 2016, London : HM Government.Research output: Other contribution
Open AccessFile5 Downloads (Pure) -
2015
Section 121 Criminal Justice Act 2003 and Multiple Hearsay: Williams v R [2014] EWCA Crim 1862
Stockdale, M. & Piasecki, E., 1 Feb 2015, In: The Journal of Criminal Law. 79, 1, p. 9-12Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
Open Access -
2014
Criminal Justice Act 2003, s.124 and evidence of credibility
Piasecki, E. & Stockdale, M., Jun 2014, In: The Journal of Criminal Law. 78, 3, p. 210-214Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
Open Access -
Hearsay and the purpose of the maker of the statement
Piasecki, E. & Wortley, N., Apr 2014, In: Journal of Criminal Law. 78, 2, p. 117-120Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
-
2012
The Safety-Valve: discretion to admit hearsay evidence in criminal proceedings
Stockdale, M. & Piasecki, E., 2012, In: The Journal of Criminal Law. 76, 4, p. 314-332Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open Access