A comparison of moderate to late preterm neonates receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure in Australian tertiary and non-tertiary centres

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


External departments

  • Werribee Mercy Hospital, Australia
  • La Trobe University
  • University of Melbourne


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-199
Number of pages11
JournalNeonatal network : NN
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2020
Externally publishedYes
Publication type

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


Transfer of neonates ≥32 weeks' gestation with acute respiratory distress to tertiary (T) centers can be reduced by treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in nontertiary (NT) centers. This can lead to considerable financial and emotional benefits. The aim of this project was to compare management of nCPAP in T and NT centers. Design Five-year retrospective, observational cohort study (2010–2014). Sample All NT eligible neonates from four sites (n = 484) were compared with a similar randomized cohort of inborn neonates at two T centers (n = 601) in Victoria, Australia. Main outcome variable Any difference in management or short-term outcome. Results Moderately preterm and term neonates born in NT centers had lower Apgar scores at five minutes of age and received more conservative management delivered by different equipment. Despite a higher incidence of air leaks in NT centers, the short-term outcomes were otherwise similar between centers. T centers were more likely to administer nCPAP to term babies for <24 hours.