A Comparison of State Traditions and the Revival of a Nuclear Power in Four Countries

Keith Baker, Gerry Stoker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The British, American, French and Finnish governments are seeking to promote investment in a new generation of nuclear power plants. Nuclear power programmes are delivered through networks of international companies through which government must manage. This is consistent with the concept of governance. Governments can advance their policy goals by using a variety of policy instruments to shape and organize governance networks. This is known as metagovernance. The paper considers the extent to which the selection and deployment of the policy instruments used to metagovern is informed by the prevailing tradition of government. The paper examines how the British, American, French and Finnish governments have tried to metagovern. It is shown that whilst governing traditions do inform the selection and deployment of the policy instruments used to metagovern, the composition of the network, and the nature of the policy problem also plays a role in shaping government action.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)140-156
    JournalJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
    Volume17
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • nuclear power
    • comparative policy
    • governance
    • metagovernance
    • policy implementation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of State Traditions and the Revival of a Nuclear Power in Four Countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this