A comparison of theoretical line intensity ratios for Ni XII with extreme ultraviolet observations from the JET tokamak

Francis Keenan, Gert Botha, A. Matthews, K. D. Lawson, Kenneth Bell, Catherine Ramsbottom, Ivor Coffey, Martin O'Mullane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recent R-matrix calculations of electron impact excitation rates in Ni XII are used to derive the emission line ratios R1 = I (154.17 Å)/I (152.15 Å), R2 = I (152.95 Å)/I (152.15 Å) and R3 = I (160.55 Å)/I (152.15 Å). This is the first time (to our knowledge) that theoretical emission line ratios have been calculated for this ion. The ratios are found to be insensitive to changes in the adopted electron density (Ne) when Ne >= 5 × 10^11 cm−3, typical of laboratory plasmas. However, they do vary with electron temperature (Te), with for example R1 and R3 changing by factors of 1.3 and 1.8, respectively, between Te = 10^5 and 10^6 K. A comparison of the theoretical line ratios with measurements from the Joint European Torus (JET) tokamak reveals very good agreement between theory and observation for R1, with an average discrepancy of only 7%. Agreement between the calculated and experimental ratios for R2 and R3 is less satisfactory, with average differences of 30 and 33%, respectively. These probably arise from errors in the JET instrument calibration curve. However, the discrepancies are smaller than the uncertainties in the R2 and R3 measurements. Our results, in particular for R1, provide experimental support for the accuracy of the Ni XII line ratio calculations, and hence for the atomic data adopted in their derivation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)639-645
JournalJournal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of theoretical line intensity ratios for Ni XII with extreme ultraviolet observations from the JET tokamak'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this