TY - JOUR
T1 - A critical care pandemic staffing framework in Australia
AU - Marshall, Andrea P.
AU - Austin, Danielle E.
AU - Chamberlain, Di
AU - Chapple, Lee anne S.
AU - Cree, Michele
AU - Fetterplace, Kate
AU - Foster, Michelle
AU - Freeman-Sanderson, Amy
AU - Fyfe, Rachel
AU - Grealy, Bernadette A.
AU - Hodak, Alison
AU - Holley, Anthony
AU - Kruger, Peter
AU - Kucharski, Geraldine
AU - Pollock, Wendy
AU - Ridley, Emma
AU - Stewart, Penny
AU - Thomas, Peter
AU - Torresi, Kym
AU - Williams, Linda
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses, the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, the College of Intensive Care Medicine, the Dietitians Association of Australia, the Society of Hospital Pharmacists Australia, Speech Pathology Australia, and the Australian Physiotherapy Association for providing comment on these recommendations.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - Background: Pandemics and the large-scale outbreak of infectious disease can significantly impact morbidity and mortality worldwide. The impact on intensive care resources can be significant and often require modification of service delivery, a key element which includes rapid expansion of the critical care workforce. Pandemics are also unpredictable, which necessitates rapid decision-making and action which, in the lack of experience and guidance, may be extremely challenging. Recognising the potential strain on intensive care units (ICUs), particularly on staffing, a working group was formed for the purpose of developing recommendations to support decision-making during rapid service expansion. Methods: The Critical Care Pandemic Staffing Working Party (n = 21), representing nursing, allied health, and medical disciplines, has used a modified consensus approach to provide recommendations to inform multidisciplinary workforce capacity expansion planning in critical care. Results: A total of 60 recommendations have been proposed which reflect general recommendations as well as those specific to maintaining the critical care workforce, expanding the critical care workforce, rostering and allocation of the critical care workforce, nurse-specific recommendations for staffing the ICU, education support and training during ICU surge situations, workforce support, models of care, and de-escalation. Conclusion: These recommendations are provided with the intent that they be used to guide interdisciplinary decision-making, and we suggest that careful consideration is given to the local context to determine which recommendations are most appropriate to implement and how they are prioritised. Ongoing evaluation of recommendation implementation and impact will be necessary, particularly in rapidly changing clinical contexts.
AB - Background: Pandemics and the large-scale outbreak of infectious disease can significantly impact morbidity and mortality worldwide. The impact on intensive care resources can be significant and often require modification of service delivery, a key element which includes rapid expansion of the critical care workforce. Pandemics are also unpredictable, which necessitates rapid decision-making and action which, in the lack of experience and guidance, may be extremely challenging. Recognising the potential strain on intensive care units (ICUs), particularly on staffing, a working group was formed for the purpose of developing recommendations to support decision-making during rapid service expansion. Methods: The Critical Care Pandemic Staffing Working Party (n = 21), representing nursing, allied health, and medical disciplines, has used a modified consensus approach to provide recommendations to inform multidisciplinary workforce capacity expansion planning in critical care. Results: A total of 60 recommendations have been proposed which reflect general recommendations as well as those specific to maintaining the critical care workforce, expanding the critical care workforce, rostering and allocation of the critical care workforce, nurse-specific recommendations for staffing the ICU, education support and training during ICU surge situations, workforce support, models of care, and de-escalation. Conclusion: These recommendations are provided with the intent that they be used to guide interdisciplinary decision-making, and we suggest that careful consideration is given to the local context to determine which recommendations are most appropriate to implement and how they are prioritised. Ongoing evaluation of recommendation implementation and impact will be necessary, particularly in rapidly changing clinical contexts.
KW - Allied health
KW - Coronavirus disease
KW - Education
KW - Infection prevention and control
KW - Models of care
KW - Nursing
KW - Pandemic
KW - Surge capacity
KW - Workforce
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092236928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.08.007
DO - 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.08.007
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85092236928
SN - 1036-7314
VL - 34
SP - 123
EP - 131
JO - Australian Critical Care
JF - Australian Critical Care
IS - 2
ER -