Abstract
This article examines the viability of the Risk Predictor Model (RPM) and its counterpart the actuarial risk assessment (ARA) tool in the form of the Tuituia Assessment Framework to address child vulnerability in New Zealand. In doing so, it suggests that these types of risk-assessment tools fail to address issues of contingency and complexity at the heart of the relationship-based nature of social work practice. Such developments have considerable implications for the capacity to enhance critical reflexive practice skills, whilst the introduction of these risk tools is occurring at a time when the reflexive space is being eroded as a result of the increased regulation of practice and supervision. It is further asserted that the primary aim of such instruments is not so much to detect risk, but rather to foster professional conformity with these managerialist risk-management systems so prevalent in contemporary Western societies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1208–1223 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | The British Journal of Social Work |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 15 Apr 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2016 |
Keywords
- Actuarial risks assessment
- Predictive Risk Model
- managerialism
- Tuituia Assessment
- contingency
- informal logics of risk