A Pilot Study Exploring the Factors that Influence the Decision to have PEG Feeding in Patients with Progressive Conditions

Siobhan Vesey, Paula Leslie, Catherine Exley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This original pilot study was conducted to explore and understand the factors that influence a patient’s decision-making when considering percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement for nonoral nutrition and hydration supplementation. Seven patients living with progressive dysphagic symptoms who had made a decision about percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement were interviewed and their responses analyzed using the constant comparison method. All participants felt they had no option other than to accept the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. The impact of visible physical deterioration and medical opinion were the most powerful influences on patients’ decisions. Patients’ perception of their involvement in the decision varied. This was linked to the amount and timing of information supplied and support they felt they received. Few patients have prior knowledge of tube feeding and rely heavily on medical advice. Effective communication by healthcare professionals can promote an environment that is supportive of patients’ involvement in decisions. Adequate preparation time is vital if patients are to stop feeling uninvolved or peripheral to the decision-making process. Multidisciplinary teams need to address their working practices so that they do not intimidate patients, but rather empower patients in their decision-making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)310-316
Number of pages7
JournalDysphagia
Volume23
Issue number3
Early online date25 Apr 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Apr 2008

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Pilot Study Exploring the Factors that Influence the Decision to have PEG Feeding in Patients with Progressive Conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this