TY - JOUR
T1 - A quantitative evaluation of a regional Positive Behavioural Support workforce development approach
AU - McKenzie, Karen
AU - Murray, George
AU - Martin, Rachel
AU - Murray, Aja
AU - Metcalfe, Dale
N1 - Funding information: The project was funded by Middlesbrough Council on behalf of Tees Local Authorities, NHS England North East and Cumbria, South Tyneside CCG on behalf of regional CCGs.
PY - 2021/11/1
Y1 - 2021/11/1
N2 - Background: Research suggests that providing staff with input in relation to Positive Behavioural Support (PBS) can have beneficial outcomes. Much of this research, however, fails to take account of systemic issues and does not include a control group. Method: We used a non-randomised, controlled group design to evaluate accredited PBS programmes, delivered as part of a systemic, regional and workforce development approach. We compared outcomes of those attending the programmes (n = 240) with a control group (n = 54), pre- and post-intervention and at 3-months follow-up. Results: The programme and its wider impact were rated positively. Significant intervention effects were found for staff practice and retention, but not for staff knowledge and attributions, or behaviours that challenge and quality of life of those being supported. Conclusions: The results are discussed in the context of the study limitations and restrictions resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic.
AB - Background: Research suggests that providing staff with input in relation to Positive Behavioural Support (PBS) can have beneficial outcomes. Much of this research, however, fails to take account of systemic issues and does not include a control group. Method: We used a non-randomised, controlled group design to evaluate accredited PBS programmes, delivered as part of a systemic, regional and workforce development approach. We compared outcomes of those attending the programmes (n = 240) with a control group (n = 54), pre- and post-intervention and at 3-months follow-up. Results: The programme and its wider impact were rated positively. Significant intervention effects were found for staff practice and retention, but not for staff knowledge and attributions, or behaviours that challenge and quality of life of those being supported. Conclusions: The results are discussed in the context of the study limitations and restrictions resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic.
KW - Positive Behavioural Support
KW - autism
KW - behaviours that challenge
KW - impact
KW - intellectual disability
KW - quality of life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109015003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jar.12915
DO - 10.1111/jar.12915
M3 - Article
VL - 34
SP - 1641
EP - 1654
JO - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
JF - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
SN - 1360-2322
IS - 6
ER -