A review of strategic visioning and organizational performance: epistemological challenges

Kristiina Niemi-Kaija*, Steven Pattinson

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    29 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Purpose

    The purpose of this systematic narrative review is to discourse on vision and organizational performance. By analysing work-life and organization studies journals, the authors respond to a call to view the process of visioning more holistically.

    Design/methodology/approach

    The methodological approach is a discourse-oriented qualitative content analysis. The authors explore visioning through an epistemological lens, which emphasizes both the connections and differences between “traditional” philosophical approaches.

    Findings

    The findings show how the different interpretations of vision and related concepts are tied to the following themes: clarity, causality, embodiment and sensory experiences and actionability.

    Originality/value

    Through the frameworks of scientific realism and relativism, the authors illustrate novel insights into the ways in which visioning occupies a place in knowledge management.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)673-688
    Number of pages16
    JournalManagement Research Review
    Volume47
    Issue number5
    Early online date30 Nov 2023
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 9 Apr 2024

    Keywords

    • Epistemology
    • Organizational strategy
    • Performance
    • Realism
    • Relativism
    • Strategic management
    • Visioning

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A review of strategic visioning and organizational performance: epistemological challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this