TY - JOUR
T1 - Action after Adverse Events in Healthcare
T2 - An Integrative Literature Review
AU - Liukka , Mari
AU - Steven, Alison
AU - Vizcaya Moreno, M Flores
AU - Sara-aho, Arja M
AU - Khakurel, Jayden
AU - Pearson, Pauline
AU - Turunen, Hannele
AU - Tella, Susanna
N1 - Funding information: The sixth author would like to thank INVEST Research Flagship funded by the Academy of Finland Flagship Programme (decision number: 320162).
PY - 2020/6/30
Y1 - 2020/6/30
N2 - Adverse events are common in healthcare. Three types of victims of patient-related adverse events can be identified. The first type includes patients and their families, the second type includes healthcare professionals involved in an adverse event and the third type includes healthcare organisations in which an adverse event occurs. The purpose of this integrative review is to synthesise knowledge, theory and evidence regarding action after adverse events, based on literature published in the last ten years (2009–2018). In the studies critically evaluated (n = 25), key themes emerged relating to the first, second and third victim elements. The first victim elements comprise attention to revealing an adverse event, communication after an event, first victim support and complete apology. The second victim elements include second victim support types and services, coping strategies, professional changes after adverse events and learning about adverse event phenomena. The third victim elements consist of organisational action after adverse events, strategy, infrastructure and training and open communication about adverse events. There is a lack of comprehensive models for action after adverse events. This requires understanding of the phenomenon along with ambition to manage adverse events as a whole. When an adverse event is identified and a concern expressed, systematic damage preventing and ameliorating actions should be immediately launched. System-wide development is needed.
AB - Adverse events are common in healthcare. Three types of victims of patient-related adverse events can be identified. The first type includes patients and their families, the second type includes healthcare professionals involved in an adverse event and the third type includes healthcare organisations in which an adverse event occurs. The purpose of this integrative review is to synthesise knowledge, theory and evidence regarding action after adverse events, based on literature published in the last ten years (2009–2018). In the studies critically evaluated (n = 25), key themes emerged relating to the first, second and third victim elements. The first victim elements comprise attention to revealing an adverse event, communication after an event, first victim support and complete apology. The second victim elements include second victim support types and services, coping strategies, professional changes after adverse events and learning about adverse event phenomena. The third victim elements consist of organisational action after adverse events, strategy, infrastructure and training and open communication about adverse events. There is a lack of comprehensive models for action after adverse events. This requires understanding of the phenomenon along with ambition to manage adverse events as a whole. When an adverse event is identified and a concern expressed, systematic damage preventing and ameliorating actions should be immediately launched. System-wide development is needed.
KW - Adverse events
KW - First victims
KW - Management
KW - Patient safety
KW - Second victims
KW - Third victims
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087356604&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph17134717
DO - 10.3390/ijerph17134717
M3 - Literature review
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 17
SP - 1
EP - 16
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 13
M1 - 4717
ER -