Abstract
There are fewer than 20,000 prokaryotic species with validly published names, meaning >99% of a reasonable estimate of microbial diversity remains formally unnamed. Here we explore the damaging consequences of the current practice in which each new species is described in a standardized publication, most typically a 'single strain species description'. This approach is both an impediment to scaling up progress in naming the microbial world and also a significant factor in the poor reputation of the discipline of microbial taxonomy. We conclude that significant changes in author habits are needed and make constructive suggestions as to how author practice should adapt.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 100931 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-7 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | New Microbes and New Infections |
| Volume | 43 |
| Early online date | 13 Aug 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2021 |
Keywords
- phylogenomics
- microbial culture
- microbial diversity
- taxonomy
- systematics
- Microbial culture
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing the sublime scale of the microbial world: reconciling an appreciation of microbial diversity with the need to describe species'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver