TY - JOUR
T1 - An overview of conventional and non-conventional techniques for machining of titanium alloys
AU - Oke, Samuel Ranti
AU - Ogunwande, Gabriel Seun
AU - Onifade, Moshood
AU - Aikulola, Emmanuel
AU - Adewale, Esther Dolapo
AU - Olawale, Olumide Emmanuel
AU - Ayodele, Babapelumi Ebun
AU - Mwema, Fredrick
AU - Obiko, Japheth
AU - Bodunrin, Michael Oluwatosin
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported through the AESA-RISE Fellowship Programme [ARPDF 18-03], African Materials Science and Engineering Network (A Carnegie-IAS RISE network) and the DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Strong Materials. AESA-RISE is an independent funding scheme of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS) implemented with the support of Carnegie Corporation of New York. At The AAS, AESA-RISE is implemented through AESA, the Academy’s agenda and programmatic platform, created in collaboration with the African Union Development Agency (AUDA-NEPAD). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the AAS, AUDA-NEPAD or Carnegie Corporation.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Machining is one of the major contributors to the high cost of titanium-based components. This is as a result of severe tool wear and high volume of waste generated from the workpiece. Research efforts seeking to reduce the cost of titanium alloys have explored the possibility of either eliminating machining as a processing step or optimising parameters for machining titanium alloys. Since the former is still at the infant stage, this article provides a review on the common machining techniques that were used for processing titanium-based components. These techniques are classified into two major categories based on the type of contact between the titanium workpiece and the tool. The two categories were dubbed conventional and non-conventional machining techniques. Most of the parameters that are associated with these techniques and their corresponding machinability indicators were presented. The common machinability indicators that are covered in this review include surface roughness, cutting forces, tool wear rate, chip formation and material removal rate. However, surface roughness, tool wear rate and metal removal rate were emphasised. The critical or optimum combination of parameters for achieving improved machinability was also highlighted. Some recommendations on future research directions are made.
AB - Machining is one of the major contributors to the high cost of titanium-based components. This is as a result of severe tool wear and high volume of waste generated from the workpiece. Research efforts seeking to reduce the cost of titanium alloys have explored the possibility of either eliminating machining as a processing step or optimising parameters for machining titanium alloys. Since the former is still at the infant stage, this article provides a review on the common machining techniques that were used for processing titanium-based components. These techniques are classified into two major categories based on the type of contact between the titanium workpiece and the tool. The two categories were dubbed conventional and non-conventional machining techniques. Most of the parameters that are associated with these techniques and their corresponding machinability indicators were presented. The common machinability indicators that are covered in this review include surface roughness, cutting forces, tool wear rate, chip formation and material removal rate. However, surface roughness, tool wear rate and metal removal rate were emphasised. The critical or optimum combination of parameters for achieving improved machinability was also highlighted. Some recommendations on future research directions are made.
KW - Cutting forces
KW - Finite element simulations
KW - Lubrication conditions
KW - Material removal rate
KW - Surface roughness
KW - Titanium alloys
KW - Tool wear rate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093536938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1051/mfreview/2020029
DO - 10.1051/mfreview/2020029
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85093536938
SN - 2265-4224
VL - 7
JO - Manufacturing Review
JF - Manufacturing Review
M1 - 34
ER -