Analysis and comparison of conventional two-stage converter and single stage bridgeless AC-DC converter for off-road battery charger application

Mehdi Salehifar; Ghanim Putrus; Peter Barras

doi:10.1049/cp.2016.0362

Analysis and comparison of conventional two-stage converter and single stage bridgeless AC-DC converter for off-road battery charger application

Mehdi Salehifar, Ghanim Putrus, Peter Barras

Mathematics, Physics and Electrical Engineering

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison between conventional two-stage battery charger consisting of power factor correction (PFC) stage seeding DCDC half bridge LLC resonant converter and a single-stage bridgeless topology. Efficiency, electrical stress, and simplicity are considered as main performance criteria. A brief description of the design and performance analysis is given for each case. To validate the theory, a 750W, 48V DC output battery charger with universal input volatge 85-265V 50/60 Hz is simulated in Matlab/Simulink under different load and grid voltage conditions.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	8th IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2016)
Place of Publication	Piscataway
Publisher	IEEE
Volume	2016
ISBN (Print)	978-1-78561-188-9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2016.0362
Publication status	Published - Apr 2016

Keywords

off-road electric vehicle
battery charger
neighbourhood electric vehicle
LLC
bridgeless converter

Access to Document

10.1049/cp.2016.0362

Cite this

@inbook{86e98bf5a78b4b0baf8903d964ae883a,

title = "Analysis and comparison of conventional two-stage converter and single stage bridgeless AC-DC converter for off-road battery charger application",

abstract = "This paper presents a comparison between conventional two-stage battery charger consisting of power factor correction (PFC) stage seeding DCDC half bridge LLC resonant converter and a single-stage bridgeless topology. Efficiency, electrical stress, and simplicity are considered as main performance criteria. A brief description of the design and performance analysis is given for each case. To validate the theory, a 750W, 48V DC output battery charger with universal input volatge 85-265V 50/60 Hz is simulated in Matlab/Simulink under different load and grid voltage conditions.",

keywords = "off-road electric vehicle, battery charger, neighbourhood electric vehicle, LLC, bridgeless converter",

author = "Mehdi Salehifar and Ghanim Putrus and Peter Barras",

year = "2016",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1049/cp.2016.0362",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-78561-188-9",

volume = "2016",

booktitle = "8th IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2016)",

publisher = "IEEE",

address = "United States",

}

Analysis and comparison of conventional two-stage converter and single stage bridgeless AC-DC converter for off-road battery charger application. / Salehifar, Mehdi; Putrus, Ghanim; Barras, Peter.
8th IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2016). Vol. 2016 Piscataway: IEEE, 2016.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Analysis and comparison of conventional two-stage converter and single stage bridgeless AC-DC converter for off-road battery charger application

AU - Salehifar, Mehdi

AU - Putrus, Ghanim

AU - Barras, Peter

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - This paper presents a comparison between conventional two-stage battery charger consisting of power factor correction (PFC) stage seeding DCDC half bridge LLC resonant converter and a single-stage bridgeless topology. Efficiency, electrical stress, and simplicity are considered as main performance criteria. A brief description of the design and performance analysis is given for each case. To validate the theory, a 750W, 48V DC output battery charger with universal input volatge 85-265V 50/60 Hz is simulated in Matlab/Simulink under different load and grid voltage conditions.

AB - This paper presents a comparison between conventional two-stage battery charger consisting of power factor correction (PFC) stage seeding DCDC half bridge LLC resonant converter and a single-stage bridgeless topology. Efficiency, electrical stress, and simplicity are considered as main performance criteria. A brief description of the design and performance analysis is given for each case. To validate the theory, a 750W, 48V DC output battery charger with universal input volatge 85-265V 50/60 Hz is simulated in Matlab/Simulink under different load and grid voltage conditions.

KW - off-road electric vehicle

KW - battery charger

KW - neighbourhood electric vehicle

KW - LLC

KW - bridgeless converter

U2 - 10.1049/cp.2016.0362

DO - 10.1049/cp.2016.0362

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-78561-188-9

VL - 2016

BT - 8th IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2016)

PB - IEEE

CY - Piscataway

ER -

Analysis and comparison of conventional two-stage converter and single stage bridgeless AC-DC converter for off-road battery charger application

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this