TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of swimming performance
T2 - perceptions and practices of US-based swimming coaches
AU - Mooney, Robert
AU - Corley, Gavin
AU - Godfrey, Alan
AU - Osborough, Conor
AU - Newell, John
AU - Quinlan, Leo Richard
AU - ÓLaighin, Gearóid
PY - 2016/6/2
Y1 - 2016/6/2
N2 - In elite swimming, a broad range of methods are used to assess performance, inform coaching practices and monitor athletic progression. The aim of this paper was to examine the performance analysis practices of swimming coaches and to explore the reasons behind the decisions that coaches take when analysing performance. Survey data were analysed from 298 Level 3 competitive swimming coaches (245 male, 53 female) based in the United States. Results were compiled to provide a generalised picture of practices and perceptions and to examine key emerging themes. It was found that a disparity exists between the importance swim coaches place on biomechanical analysis of swimming performance and the types of analyses that are actually conducted. Video-based methods are most frequently employed, with over 70% of coaches using these methods at least monthly, with analyses being mainly qualitative in nature rather than quantitative. Barriers to the more widespread use of quantitative biomechanical analysis in elite swimming environments were explored. Constraints include time, cost and availability of resources, but other factors such as sources of information on swimming performance and analysis and control over service provision are also discussed, with particular emphasis on video-based methods and emerging sensor-based technologies.
AB - In elite swimming, a broad range of methods are used to assess performance, inform coaching practices and monitor athletic progression. The aim of this paper was to examine the performance analysis practices of swimming coaches and to explore the reasons behind the decisions that coaches take when analysing performance. Survey data were analysed from 298 Level 3 competitive swimming coaches (245 male, 53 female) based in the United States. Results were compiled to provide a generalised picture of practices and perceptions and to examine key emerging themes. It was found that a disparity exists between the importance swim coaches place on biomechanical analysis of swimming performance and the types of analyses that are actually conducted. Video-based methods are most frequently employed, with over 70% of coaches using these methods at least monthly, with analyses being mainly qualitative in nature rather than quantitative. Barriers to the more widespread use of quantitative biomechanical analysis in elite swimming environments were explored. Constraints include time, cost and availability of resources, but other factors such as sources of information on swimming performance and analysis and control over service provision are also discussed, with particular emphasis on video-based methods and emerging sensor-based technologies.
KW - biomechanics
KW - coaching
KW - inertial sensor
KW - Swimming
KW - video analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84960242460
U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2015.1085074
DO - 10.1080/02640414.2015.1085074
M3 - Article
C2 - 26359951
AN - SCOPUS:84960242460
SN - 0264-0414
VL - 34
SP - 997
EP - 1005
JO - Journal of Sports Sciences
JF - Journal of Sports Sciences
IS - 11
ER -