Abstract
There is an enduring legacy of trivialisation and ineffectiveness at various stages in the criminal justice process when it comes to responding to domestic violence. One area of contention relates to sentence. Sentencers in England and Wales are bound by law to have regard to a number of aims: the punishment of offenders; deterrence; public protection; rehabilitation; and reparation. Whilst commentators have criticised the framework on the basis that it is contradictory and engenders inconsistency, it will be argued that granting sentencers discretion to balance the prescribed aims maximises the potential for a successful outcome in individual cases.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 242-254 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 5 Jul 2012 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Domestic violence
- Sentencing aims
- Sentencing options
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Applying generic sentencing aims in domestic violence cases in England and Wales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver