Athletes and Experimental Pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Claire Thornton*, David Sheffield, Andrew Baird

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The evidence that athletes respond to and report indices of experimental pain differently to non-athlete populations was analysed. Databases screened were SPORTDiscus, PubMED, PsycArticles, the Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL. Studies that compared experimentally induced pain responses (threshold, tolerance, intensity, unpleasantness, bothersomeness and effect on performance) in athletes and controls were included. Meta-analyses were performed where appropriate and effects were described as standardised mean differences, pooled using random effects models. Thirty-six studies (2492 participants) met the inclusion criteria comprising 19 pain tolerance, 17 pain threshold, 21 pain intensity, five pain unpleasantness, two performance in pain and one bothersomeness study. Athletes demonstrated greater pain tolerance (g = 0.88 [95% CI 0.65, 0.13]) and reported less pain intensity (g = -0.80, [95% CI -1.13, -0.47]) compared to controls; they also had higher pain threshold but with smaller effects (g = 0.41, [95% CI 0.08, 0.75]). Differences for unpleasantness did not reach statistical significance but the effects were large (g = -1.23 [95% CI -2.29, 0.18]). Two studies reported that performance in pain was better in contact athletes than non-athletes, and one concluded that athletes find pain less bothersome than controls. There were considerable inconsistencies in methods employed that were reflected in meta-analyses’ findings. Subgroup analyses of tolerance and intensity were conducted between endurance, contact and other athlete groups, but were not significant. The data suggest that athletic participation is associated with altered pain responses, but mechanisms remain unclear and more transparent methods are recommended.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Pain
Early online date26 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Dec 2023

Cite this