Abstract
Background: Primary care plays an important role in the conception and delivery of transformational research but GP engagement lacks, prompting calls for the promotion of academic opportunities in primary care.
Aim: To identify potential barriers and facilitators amongst GP trainees and trainers in primary care research to inform support given by Local Clinical Research Networks (LCRNs).
Design & setting: A cross sectional online survey was developed and distributed by the CRN to GP trainees and trainers in the North East and North West.
Method: The survey covered areas including demographics, career intentions, current and potential engagement with research as well as their general understanding of research in primary care, that included barriers and facilitators to primary care research.
Results: Trainees had low intentionality to pursue research and half of trainees did not engage with any research activity. Despite 1 in five trainees reporting intentions to include research in their career, only 1% would undertake a solely academic career. Medical school region is the only strongly associated factor with academic career intention. Just under 30% of trainers reported engagement in research, but far fewer (8.6%) were interested in contributing to research, and only 10% felt prepared to mentor in research.
Conclusion: Among trainees, there is limited engagement in, and intentionality to pursue research and this is crucially reflected by responses from trainers. This study identifies the need for LCRN’s to assist with training in research mentoring and skills, funding opportunities and to develop resources to promote research in primary care.
Aim: To identify potential barriers and facilitators amongst GP trainees and trainers in primary care research to inform support given by Local Clinical Research Networks (LCRNs).
Design & setting: A cross sectional online survey was developed and distributed by the CRN to GP trainees and trainers in the North East and North West.
Method: The survey covered areas including demographics, career intentions, current and potential engagement with research as well as their general understanding of research in primary care, that included barriers and facilitators to primary care research.
Results: Trainees had low intentionality to pursue research and half of trainees did not engage with any research activity. Despite 1 in five trainees reporting intentions to include research in their career, only 1% would undertake a solely academic career. Medical school region is the only strongly associated factor with academic career intention. Just under 30% of trainers reported engagement in research, but far fewer (8.6%) were interested in contributing to research, and only 10% felt prepared to mentor in research.
Conclusion: Among trainees, there is limited engagement in, and intentionality to pursue research and this is crucially reflected by responses from trainers. This study identifies the need for LCRN’s to assist with training in research mentoring and skills, funding opportunities and to develop resources to promote research in primary care.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | BJGPO.2021.0099 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | BJGP Open |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 8 Feb 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2022 |
Keywords
- Continuing professional development
- Cross-sectional survey
- General practice
- Medical schools
- Postgraduate education
- Primary care