TY - JOUR
T1 - Calibration of conceptual hydrological models revisited
T2 - 2. Improving optimisation and analysis
AU - Kavetski, Dmitri
AU - Kuczera, George
AU - Franks, Stewart
PY - 2006/3/30
Y1 - 2006/3/30
N2 - Conceptual hydrological modelling has under-utilised classical parameter analysis techniques (for both optimisation and uncertainty assessment) due to the prohibitively complicated nonsmooth geometry of typical parameter distributions. In the companion paper, a numerically robust model implementation framework was developed, based on stable time stepping schemes and careful threshold smoothing to eliminate the roughness of parameter surfaces. Here, this framework is exploited to enable parameter estimation using powerful and well-established techniques including: (i) Newton-type optimisation and (ii) principal-component-type (Hessian-based) uncertainty analysis. A case study using a representative rainfall-runoff-snow model illustrates the advantages of these previously unavailable methods, contrasting them with slower and less informative current approaches designed for nonsmooth functions. In addition to boosting the computational efficiency, the methods advocated in the paper yield more insight into improved model formulation and parameterisation (e.g., reducing model nonlinearity, detecting ill-conditioning and handling parameter multi-optimality). The impact of extreme model nonlinearity on model and parameter stability is also discussed, focusing on model identification aspects.
AB - Conceptual hydrological modelling has under-utilised classical parameter analysis techniques (for both optimisation and uncertainty assessment) due to the prohibitively complicated nonsmooth geometry of typical parameter distributions. In the companion paper, a numerically robust model implementation framework was developed, based on stable time stepping schemes and careful threshold smoothing to eliminate the roughness of parameter surfaces. Here, this framework is exploited to enable parameter estimation using powerful and well-established techniques including: (i) Newton-type optimisation and (ii) principal-component-type (Hessian-based) uncertainty analysis. A case study using a representative rainfall-runoff-snow model illustrates the advantages of these previously unavailable methods, contrasting them with slower and less informative current approaches designed for nonsmooth functions. In addition to boosting the computational efficiency, the methods advocated in the paper yield more insight into improved model formulation and parameterisation (e.g., reducing model nonlinearity, detecting ill-conditioning and handling parameter multi-optimality). The impact of extreme model nonlinearity on model and parameter stability is also discussed, focusing on model identification aspects.
KW - Hessian-covariance analysis
KW - Least squares methods
KW - Model nonlinearity
KW - Model stability
KW - Newton optimisation
KW - ODE optimisation
KW - Parameter calibration and estimation
KW - Parameter uncertainty
KW - Rainfall-runoff-snow models
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33644521269
VL - 320
SP - 187
EP - 201
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
SN - 0022-1694
IS - 1-2
ER -