Canny good, or quite canny? The semantic-syntactic distribution of canny in the North East of England

Claire Childs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The word canny has long been associated with the dialects of the North East of England, most typically in its adjectival sense. However, it has four distinct functions (adjective, adverb, intensifier and modifier in quantifying expressions), which this paper tracks in a diachronic speech corpus. Although the intensifier (e.g. it’s canny good) is documented in the Survey of English Dialects (Upton, Parry and Widowson 1994), it appears in the corpus later than expected with the profile of an incoming form. Results from a judgement task corroborate the corpus trends and show that people’s intuitions about intensifier canny correlate with age as well as the semantics and position of the following adjective, in such a way that shows the intensifier is not fully delexicalised. The present research highlights the value of combining production and perception data in establishing how the origins of a linguistic item affect its distribution in its new function.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238-266
JournalEnglish World-Wide
Volume37
Issue number3
Early online date14 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Oct 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Canny good, or quite canny? The semantic-syntactic distribution of canny in the North East of England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this