TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges in Interpreting Geochemical Data
T2 - An Appraisal of Analytical Techniques Applied to a Karstic Lake Sediment Record
AU - Haliuc, Aritina
AU - Bonk, Alicja
AU - Longman, Jack
AU - Hutchinson, Simon M.
AU - Zak, Michal
AU - Veres, Daniel
N1 - Funding information: This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS–UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-0914, within PNCDI III, and by a grant of the Ministry of Research and Innovation, project number PN-III-P4-ID-PCCF-2016-0016 (DARK-FOOD). AH was partially sponsored by the Romanian Young Academy, which is funded by Stiftung Mercator and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for the period 2020–2022.
PY - 2022/3/4
Y1 - 2022/3/4
N2 - The paleoclimatic and paleoenvironmental changes inferred from shifts in lake sediment geochemistry require reliable, efficient and cost-effective methods of analysis. The available geochemical techniques, however, suggest that different analytical approaches can influence data interpretation. X-ray fluorescence core scanner analyses (XRF-CS), field portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) were concurrently applied to provide a multi-method geochemical appraisal of a 6000-year-long karstic sediment record (Lake Ighiel, Romania). The comparison between techniques was based on a set of elements that are widely employed in environmental reconstructions (Ti, K, Fe, Ca). Descriptive and statistical approaches were used to assess the advantages and disadvantages of each method and assess their optimal use in karstic environments. Our data display similar downcore patterns, with strong to moderate correlations between the datasets. The discrepancies observed between method-specific downcore multi element behaviour are related to the preparation steps and sampling. To best capture the complexity of past environmental changes in karstic settings, a combination of quantitative and qualitative geochemical methods would be the most appropriate approach to reliable data acquisition and subsequent paleoenvironmental interpretation of lake sediment data.
AB - The paleoclimatic and paleoenvironmental changes inferred from shifts in lake sediment geochemistry require reliable, efficient and cost-effective methods of analysis. The available geochemical techniques, however, suggest that different analytical approaches can influence data interpretation. X-ray fluorescence core scanner analyses (XRF-CS), field portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) were concurrently applied to provide a multi-method geochemical appraisal of a 6000-year-long karstic sediment record (Lake Ighiel, Romania). The comparison between techniques was based on a set of elements that are widely employed in environmental reconstructions (Ti, K, Fe, Ca). Descriptive and statistical approaches were used to assess the advantages and disadvantages of each method and assess their optimal use in karstic environments. Our data display similar downcore patterns, with strong to moderate correlations between the datasets. The discrepancies observed between method-specific downcore multi element behaviour are related to the preparation steps and sampling. To best capture the complexity of past environmental changes in karstic settings, a combination of quantitative and qualitative geochemical methods would be the most appropriate approach to reliable data acquisition and subsequent paleoenvironmental interpretation of lake sediment data.
KW - Clastic sediments
KW - Data treatment
KW - Geochemistry
KW - Paleolimnology
KW - SE Europe
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126339412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/w14050806
DO - 10.3390/w14050806
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126339412
VL - 14
SP - 1
EP - 16
JO - Water
JF - Water
SN - 2073-4441
IS - 5
M1 - 806
ER -