Changing assessment practice in engineering : how can understanding lecturer perspectives help?

Liz McDowell, Su White, Hugh Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessment in engineering disciplines is typically oriented to demonstrating competence in specific tasks. Even where assessments are intended to have a formative component, little priority may be given to feedback. Engineering departments are often criticized, by their students and by external quality reviewers, for paying insufficient attention to formative assessment. The e3an project set out to build a question bank of peer-reviewed questions for use within electrical and electronic engineering. As a part of this process, a number of engineers from disparate institutions were required to work together in teams, designing a range of assessments for their subject specialisms. The project team observed that lecturers were especially keen to develop formative assessment but that their understanding of what might be required varied considerably. This paper describes the various ways in which the processes of the project have engaged lecturers in actively identifying and developing their conceptions of teaching, learning and assessment in their subject. It reports on an interview study that was conducted with a selection of participants. It is concluded that lecturers’ reflections on and understanding of assessment are closely related to the nature of the subject domain and that it is essential when attempting to improve assessment practice to start from the perspective of lecturers in the discipline.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-181
JournalEuropean Journal of Engineering Education
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2004

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Changing assessment practice in engineering : how can understanding lecturer perspectives help?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this