Chemical etching of Sb2Se3 solar cells: Surface chemistry and back contact behaviour

Huw Shiel, Oliver S. Hutter*, Laurie J. Phillips, Mohammed Al Turkestani, Vin R. Dhanak, Tim D. Veal, Ken Durose, Jonathan D. Major

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effect of (NH4)2S and CS2 chemical etches on surface chemistry and contacting in Sb2Se3 solar cells was investigated via a combination of x-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) and photovoltaic device analysis. Thin film solar cells were produced in superstrate configuration with an absorber layer deposited by close space sublimation. Devices of up to 5.7% efficiency were compared via current–voltage measurements (J–V) and temperature-dependent current–voltage (J–V–T) analysis. XPS analysis demonstrated that both etching processes were successful in removing Sb2O3 contamination, while there was no decrease in free elemental selenium content by either etch, in contrast to prior work. Using J–V–T analysis the removal of Sb2O3 at the back surface in etched samples was found to improve contacting by reducing the potential barrier at the back contact from 0.43 eV to 0.26 eV and lowering the series resistance. However, J–V data showed that due to the decrease in shunt resistance and short-circuit current as a result of etching, the devices show a lower efficiency following both etches, despite a lowering of the series resistance. Further optimisation of the etching process yielded an improved efficiency of 6.6%. This work elucidates the role of surface treatments in Sb2Se3 devices and resolves inconsistencies in previously published works.

Original languageEnglish
Article number045001
Number of pages10
JournalJPhys Energy
Volume1
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chemical etching of Sb2Se3 solar cells: Surface chemistry and back contact behaviour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this