Child death review processes: A six-country comparison

Sharon Vincent*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares and contrasts child death review (CDR) structures and processes in six countries - Australia, New Zealand, the United States, Canada, England and Wales. It presents findings from a comparative study based on analysis of data from 18 case studies. Data were collected through a combination of documentary analysis, interviews and observations. The study found that CDR processes vary according to: where the function is located and whether review is undertaken at state, local or national level; whether review is rooted in legislation; the focus of review; whether dedicated funding is provided; whether families are involved in the process; and whether structures are supported by useful data systems. It was not possible to evaluate the effectiveness of different review systems but the findings suggest that structure makes little difference in terms of determining the extent to which CDR findings inform prevention effort and activity. While factors such as lack of funding, lack of national data, or lack of legislation may hinder the work of CDR teams, CDR findings have informed prevention initiatives despite such barriers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)116-129
Number of pages14
JournalChild Abuse Review
Volume23
Issue number2
Early online date25 Jun 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Child death review processes: A six-country comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this