Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Childhood socioeconomic deprivation, but not current mood, is associated with behavioural disinhibition in adults

Tunde Paál*, Thomas Carpenter*, Daniel Nettle

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is evidence to suggest that impulsivity is predicted by socioeconomic background, with people from more deprived backgrounds tending to be more impulsive, and by current mood, with poorer mood associated with greater impulsivity. However, impulsivity is not a unitary construct, and previous research in this area has focused on measures of ‘waiting’ impulsivity rather than behavioural disinhibition. We administered a standard measure of behavioural disinhibition, the stop-signal task, to 58 adult participants from a community sample. We had measured socioeconomic background using participant postcode at age 16, and assigned participants to receive either a neutral or a negative mood induction. We found no effects of mood on behavioural disinhibition, but we found a significant effect of socioeconomic background. Participants who had lived in more deprived postcodes at age 16 showed longer stop-signal reaction times, and hence greater behavioural disinhibition. The pattern was independent of participant age and overall reaction time. Though caution is required inferring causality from correlation, it is possible that that experiencing socioeconomic deprivation in childhood and adolescence may lead to greater behavioural disinhibition in adulthood.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere964
Number of pages13
JournalPeerJ
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 May 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Impulsivity
  • Behavioural inhibition
  • Socioeconomic deprivation
  • Social gradients
  • Addiction
  • Stop-signal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Childhood socioeconomic deprivation, but not current mood, is associated with behavioural disinhibition in adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this