TY - JOUR
T1 - Circadian rhythm gene regulation in the housefly Musca domestica
AU - Codd, Veryan
AU - Dolezel, David
AU - Stehlik, Jan
AU - Piccin, Alberto
AU - Garner, Karen J.
AU - Racey, Seth N.
AU - Straatman, Kornelis R.
AU - Louis, Edward J.
AU - Costa, Rodolfo
AU - Sauman, Ivo
AU - Kyriacou, Charalambos P.
AU - Rosato, Ezio
N1 - Funding information:
We thank the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council for a David Philips Fellowship to E.R. and a committee Ph.D. studentship to V.C. We also thank the European Community for grants to C.P.K. and R.C. and the Wellcome Trust for a grant to C.P.K. and E.R. and for a program grant to E.L. C.P.K. acknowledges the Royal Society for a Wolfson Research Merit Fellowship. This work was supported in part by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, grant 204/04/0862 (I.S.), and the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic, project 2B06129 (I.S.)
PY - 2007/11/1
Y1 - 2007/11/1
N2 - The circadian mechanism appears remarkably conserved between Drosophila and mammals, with basic underlying negative and positive feedback loops, cycling gene products, and temporally regulated nuclear transport involving a few key proteins. One of these negative regulators is PERIOD, which in Drosophila shows very similar temporal and spatial regulation to TIMELESS. Surprisingly, we observe that in the housefly, Musca domestica, PER does not cycle in Western blots of head extracts, in contrast to the TIM protein. Furthermore, immunocytochemical (ICC) localization using enzymatic staining procedures reveals that PER is not localized to the nucleus of any neurons within the brain at any circadian time, as recently observed for several nondipteran insects. However, with confocal analysis, immunofluorescence reveals a very different picture and provides an initial comparison of PER/TIM-containing cells in Musca and Drosophila, which shows some significant differences, but many similarities. Thus, even in closely related Diptera, there is considerable evolutionary flexibility in the number and spatial organization of clock cells and, indeed, in the expression patterns of clock products in these cells, although the underlying framework is similar.
AB - The circadian mechanism appears remarkably conserved between Drosophila and mammals, with basic underlying negative and positive feedback loops, cycling gene products, and temporally regulated nuclear transport involving a few key proteins. One of these negative regulators is PERIOD, which in Drosophila shows very similar temporal and spatial regulation to TIMELESS. Surprisingly, we observe that in the housefly, Musca domestica, PER does not cycle in Western blots of head extracts, in contrast to the TIM protein. Furthermore, immunocytochemical (ICC) localization using enzymatic staining procedures reveals that PER is not localized to the nucleus of any neurons within the brain at any circadian time, as recently observed for several nondipteran insects. However, with confocal analysis, immunofluorescence reveals a very different picture and provides an initial comparison of PER/TIM-containing cells in Musca and Drosophila, which shows some significant differences, but many similarities. Thus, even in closely related Diptera, there is considerable evolutionary flexibility in the number and spatial organization of clock cells and, indeed, in the expression patterns of clock products in these cells, although the underlying framework is similar.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37249009551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1534/genetics.107.079160
DO - 10.1534/genetics.107.079160
M3 - Article
C2 - 17947418
AN - SCOPUS:37249009551
SN - 0016-6731
VL - 177
SP - 1539
EP - 1551
JO - Genetics
JF - Genetics
IS - 3
ER -