Circumcision, Public Health, Genital Autonomy and Cultural Rights

Matthew Johnson (Editor), Megan O'Branski

Research output: Book/ReportBookpeer-review

Abstract

Circumcision is one of the oldest and most common surgical processes, being practised, for a range of medical, social and religious reasons, on up to 30% of males worldwide. It is currently being promoted by a range of health bodies as a means of tackling HIV in developing countries. Yet, there is significant concern about sexual, physiological and psychological effects and complications and its prophylactic effectiveness. In examining a case in which a failed circumcision was performed for religious reasons, the Regional Court in Cologne decided that the practice contravened the bodily autonomy of minors and was subject to the same legislation used to classify female genital cutting as assault. This, understandably, aroused serious concerns among various religious communities who practise circumcision. At the same time as religious groups seek to protect circumcision from comparisons with female genital cutting, there is a trend, particularly in post-colonial thought in the US, to revise negative understandings of female genital cutting by making cautious, positive comparisons with circumcision.

This collection considers the apparent contradictions and complications of the contemporary status and deployment of the many forms of genital cutting, raising a serious, wide-reaching question: what scope should society have to impose physically invasive rites on people?
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Number of pages206
ISBN (Electronic)9781315095684
ISBN (Print)9780415735445
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Circumcision, Public Health, Genital Autonomy and Cultural Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this