Climate Refugeehood: A Counterargument

Felix Bender*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper argues against the idea of climate change refugeehood. Drawing on political realism, it reconstructs the idea and function of refugeehood in international politics. Refugees are not the agencyless victims merely in search of rescue by states of the Global North, as the idea of climate refugeehood as a form of humanitarian refugeehood would have it. Nor are they simply a function of reparative justice, or of defending international state legitimacy. To liberal democracies, refugees are those fleeing political oppression. They hold an important political function in inter-state relations in undermining rival political systems and strengthening liberal democratic regimes, both ideally and materially. The idea of climate refugeehood collides with the role refugeehood plays in international politics, the reasons for their admission, and the conceptualization of their plight and function. It ought, hence, to be rejected.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalEuropean Journal of Political Theory
Early online date2 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • refugees
  • political realism
  • humanitarianism
  • asylum

Cite this