Codesigning a systemic discharge intervention for inpatient mental health settings (MINDS): a protocol for integrating realist evaluation and an engineering-based systems approach

Corinna Hackmann*, Alexander Komashie, Melanie Handley, Jamie Murdoch, Adam P. Wagner, Lisa Marie Grünwald, Sam Waller, Emma Kaminskiy, Hannah Zeilig, Julia Jones, Joy Bray, Sophie Bagge, Alan Simpson, Sonia Dalkin, John Clarkson, Giovanni Borghini, Timoleon Kipouros, Frank Rohricht, Zohra Taousi, Katie HaightonSarah Rae, Jon Wilson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)


Transition following discharge from mental health hospital is high risk in terms of relapse, readmission, and suicide. Discharge planning supports transition and reduces risk. It is a complex activity involving interacting systemic elements. The MINDS study aims to improve the process for people being discharged, their carers/supporters and staff who work in mental health services, by understanding, co designing and evaluating implementation of a systemic approach to discharge planning.

Methods and analysis
The MINDS study integrates realist research and an engineering-informed systems approach across three stages. Stage 1 applies realist review and evaluation using a systems approach to develop programme theories of discharge planning. Stage 2 uses an Engineering Better Care framework to codesign a novel systemic discharge intervention, which will be subject to process and economic evaluation in Stage 3. The programme theories and resulting care planning approach will be refined throughout the study ready for a future clinical trial. MINDS is co-led by an expert by experience, with researchers with lived experience co-leading each stage.

Ethics and dissemination
MINDS stage 1 has received ethical approval from Yorkshire & The Humber - Bradford Leeds (Research Ethics Committee (22/YH/0122). Findings from MINDS will be disseminated via high impact journal publications and conference presentations, including those with service user and mental health professional audiences. We will establish routes to engage with public and service user communities and NHS professionals including blogs, podcasts and short videos.

MINDS is funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR 133013) The realist review protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021293255).
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere071272
Number of pages10
JournalBMJ Open
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 13 Sept 2023

Cite this