Comment: R v Belhaj-Farhat [2022] EWCA Crim 115, [2022] 3 Archbold Review 3

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

Abstract

Discusses the presentation and understanding of DNA match probabilities in criminal proceedings.

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

@misc{91e6bdd6968646a0a972bcb3ec9db14c,

title = "Comment: R v Belhaj-Farhat [2022] EWCA Crim 115, [2022] 3 Archbold Review 3",

abstract = "Discusses the presentation and understanding of DNA match probabilities in criminal proceedings.",

keywords = "expert evidence, DNA evidence, secondary transfer, match probabilities, prosecutor's fallacy",

author = "Natalie Wortley",

year = "2022",

month = may,

day = "3",

language = "English",

volume = "2022",

journal = "Criminal Law Week",

issn = "1368-5589",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comment: R v Belhaj-Farhat [2022] EWCA Crim 115, [2022] 3 Archbold Review 3

AU - Wortley, Natalie

PY - 2022/5/3

Y1 - 2022/5/3

N2 - Discusses the presentation and understanding of DNA match probabilities in criminal proceedings.

AB - Discusses the presentation and understanding of DNA match probabilities in criminal proceedings.

KW - expert evidence

KW - DNA evidence

KW - secondary transfer

KW - match probabilities

KW - prosecutor's fallacy

M3 - Article

SN - 1368-5589

VL - 2022

JO - Criminal Law Week

JF - Criminal Law Week

ER -