Comment: R v Black [2020] EWCA Crim 915

Natalie Wortley

Comment: R v Black [2020] EWCA Crim 915

Natalie Wortley

Northumbria Law School

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Discusses the stages at which the strength of the prosecution case is relevant to the question of whether an inference may be drawn from a suspect's failure to mention facts when questioned.

Original language	English
Volume	2020
No.	31
Specialist publication	Criminal Law Week
Publication status	Published - 7 Sept 2020

Keywords

Silence
Adverse inferences

Access to Document

2020 08 - Black v.4Submitted manuscript, 30.1 KB

Cite this

@misc{b1660cffbedc4cfa9e49ac0e15fa6aad,

title = "Comment: R v Black [2020] EWCA Crim 915",

abstract = "Discusses the stages at which the strength of the prosecution case is relevant to the question of whether an inference may be drawn from a suspect's failure to mention facts when questioned.",

keywords = "Silence, Adverse inferences",

author = "Natalie Wortley",

year = "2020",

month = sep,

day = "7",

language = "English",

volume = "2020",

journal = "Criminal Law Week",

issn = "1368-5589",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comment: R v Black [2020] EWCA Crim 915

AU - Wortley, Natalie

PY - 2020/9/7

Y1 - 2020/9/7

N2 - Discusses the stages at which the strength of the prosecution case is relevant to the question of whether an inference may be drawn from a suspect's failure to mention facts when questioned.

AB - Discusses the stages at which the strength of the prosecution case is relevant to the question of whether an inference may be drawn from a suspect's failure to mention facts when questioned.

KW - Silence

KW - Adverse inferences

M3 - Article

SN - 1368-5589

VL - 2020

JO - Criminal Law Week

JF - Criminal Law Week

ER -

Comment: R v Black [2020] EWCA Crim 915

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this