Comment: R v Burrows [2019] EWCA Crim 889, [2019] Crim LR 1066

Natalie Wortley

Comment: R v Burrows [2019] EWCA Crim 889, [2019] Crim LR 1066

Natalie Wortley

Northumbria Law School

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Discusses the difficulties that arise when the court and advocates fail to appreciate the implications of s.22A Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, under which low-value shop theft became a summary offence.

Original language	English
Specialist publication	Criminal Law Week
Publication status	Published - 25 Nov 2019

Access to Document

Burrows_v.3Submitted manuscript, 159 KB

Cite this

@misc{8d763ee21360485ba46170c38068a52c,

title = "Comment: R v Burrows [2019] EWCA Crim 889, [2019] Crim LR 1066",

abstract = "Discusses the difficulties that arise when the court and advocates fail to appreciate the implications of s.22A Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, under which low-value shop theft became a summary offence.",

author = "Natalie Wortley",

year = "2019",

month = nov,

day = "25",

language = "English",

journal = "Criminal Law Week",

issn = "1368-5589",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comment: R v Burrows [2019] EWCA Crim 889, [2019] Crim LR 1066

AU - Wortley, Natalie

PY - 2019/11/25

Y1 - 2019/11/25

N2 - Discusses the difficulties that arise when the court and advocates fail to appreciate the implications of s.22A Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, under which low-value shop theft became a summary offence.

AB - Discusses the difficulties that arise when the court and advocates fail to appreciate the implications of s.22A Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, under which low-value shop theft became a summary offence.

M3 - Article

SN - 1368-5589

JO - Criminal Law Week

JF - Criminal Law Week

ER -

Comment: R v Burrows [2019] EWCA Crim 889, [2019] Crim LR 1066

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this