Comment: R. v Chall and others [2019] EWCA Crim 865

Natalie Wortley

Comment: R. v Chall and others [2019] EWCA Crim 865

Natalie Wortley

Northumbria Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Discusses the role of expert evidence where a sentencing guideline requires a judge to assess the degree of psychological harm suffered by the victim of an offence.

Original language	English
Article number	CLW/19/23/6
Journal	Criminal Law Week
Volume	2019
Issue number	23
Publication status	Published - 17 Jun 2019

Access to Document

2019 06 - Chall - sentencing and psychological harmAccepted author manuscript, 14.1 KB

Cite this

@article{0c8e0379783a4274b82b429e8b597311,

title = "Comment: R. v Chall and others [2019] EWCA Crim 865",

abstract = "Discusses the role of expert evidence where a sentencing guideline requires a judge to assess the degree of psychological harm suffered by the victim of an offence.",

author = "Natalie Wortley",

year = "2019",

month = jun,

day = "17",

language = "English",

volume = "2019",

journal = "Criminal Law Week",

issn = "1368-5589",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment: R. v Chall and others [2019] EWCA Crim 865

AU - Wortley, Natalie

PY - 2019/6/17

Y1 - 2019/6/17

N2 - Discusses the role of expert evidence where a sentencing guideline requires a judge to assess the degree of psychological harm suffered by the victim of an offence.

AB - Discusses the role of expert evidence where a sentencing guideline requires a judge to assess the degree of psychological harm suffered by the victim of an offence.

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 1368-5589

VL - 2019

JO - Criminal Law Week

JF - Criminal Law Week

IS - 23

M1 - CLW/19/23/6

ER -

Comment: R. v Chall and others [2019] EWCA Crim 865

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this