Comment: R v Dunster [2021] EWCA Crim 1555

Natalie Wortley

Comment: R v Dunster [2021] EWCA Crim 1555

Natalie Wortley

Northumbria Law School

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Discusses difficulties that arose in attempting to clarify expert DNA evidence for a jury in retirement.

Original language	English
Volume	2021
No.	41
Specialist publication	Criminal Law Week
Publication status	Published - 15 Nov 2021

Keywords

Expert evidence
DNA evidence
Secondary transfer

Access to Document

2021-11 - Dunster - DNASubmitted manuscript, 23.6 KB

Cite this

@misc{cb0a5cd640184c9e97c2c817da9c3793,

title = "Comment: R v Dunster [2021] EWCA Crim 1555",

abstract = "Discusses difficulties that arose in attempting to clarify expert DNA evidence for a jury in retirement. ",

keywords = "Expert evidence, DNA evidence, Secondary transfer",

author = "Natalie Wortley",

year = "2021",

month = nov,

day = "15",

language = "English",

volume = "2021",

journal = "Criminal Law Week",

issn = "1368-5589",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comment: R v Dunster [2021] EWCA Crim 1555

AU - Wortley, Natalie

PY - 2021/11/15

Y1 - 2021/11/15

N2 - Discusses difficulties that arose in attempting to clarify expert DNA evidence for a jury in retirement.

AB - Discusses difficulties that arose in attempting to clarify expert DNA evidence for a jury in retirement.

KW - Expert evidence

KW - DNA evidence

KW - Secondary transfer

M3 - Article

SN - 1368-5589

VL - 2021

JO - Criminal Law Week

JF - Criminal Law Week

ER -

Comment: R v Dunster [2021] EWCA Crim 1555

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this