Comment: R v Foy [2020] EWCA Crim 270

Natalie Wortley

Comment: R v Foy [2020] EWCA Crim 270

Natalie Wortley

Northumbria Law School

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Highlights the risks and limitations of psychiatric opinion evidence and nomenclature in addressing questions of criminal law.

Original language	English
Volume	2020
No.	10
Specialist publication	Criminal Law Week
Publication status	Published - 16 Mar 2020

Keywords

Diminished responsibility
Intoxication
Expert evidence
Psychiatric evidence

Access to Document

2020 03 - Foy - DRSubmitted manuscript, 22.5 KB

Cite this

@misc{bb3aff43e11e43c4984060dc0d4d2a5f,

title = "Comment: R v Foy [2020] EWCA Crim 270",

abstract = "Highlights the risks and limitations of psychiatric opinion evidence and nomenclature in addressing questions of criminal law.",

keywords = "Diminished responsibility, Intoxication, Expert evidence, Psychiatric evidence",

author = "Natalie Wortley",

year = "2020",

month = mar,

day = "16",

language = "English",

volume = "2020",

journal = "Criminal Law Week",

issn = "1368-5589",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comment: R v Foy [2020] EWCA Crim 270

AU - Wortley, Natalie

PY - 2020/3/16

Y1 - 2020/3/16

N2 - Highlights the risks and limitations of psychiatric opinion evidence and nomenclature in addressing questions of criminal law.

AB - Highlights the risks and limitations of psychiatric opinion evidence and nomenclature in addressing questions of criminal law.

KW - Diminished responsibility

KW - Intoxication

KW - Expert evidence

KW - Psychiatric evidence

M3 - Article

SN - 1368-5589

VL - 2020

JO - Criminal Law Week

JF - Criminal Law Week

ER -

Comment: R v Foy [2020] EWCA Crim 270

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this