Comment:  R v Jones (William Francis) [2020] EWCA Crim 1021

Natalie Wortley

Comment: R v Jones (William Francis) [2020] EWCA Crim 1021

Natalie Wortley

Northumbria Law School

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Discusses whether evidence that DNA matching that of the defendant was found on a moveable object is sufficient to establish a case to answer. Highlights the court's observations about the way in which experts should frame their conclusions.

Original language	English
Volume	2020
No.	33
Specialist publication	Criminal Law Week
Publication status	Published - 21 Sept 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Keywords

expert evidence
DNA evidence
secondary transfer

Access to Document

2020 09 - Jones v.4Submitted manuscript, 20 KB

Cite this

@misc{e2ff0aba85ff477ba816c595fb30bfe5,

title = "Comment: R v Jones (William Francis) [2020] EWCA Crim 1021",

abstract = "Discusses whether evidence that DNA matching that of the defendant was found on a moveable object is sufficient to establish a case to answer. Highlights the court's observations about the way in which experts should frame their conclusions.",

keywords = "expert evidence, DNA evidence, secondary transfer",

author = "Natalie Wortley",

year = "2020",

month = sep,

day = "21",

language = "English",

volume = "2020",

journal = "Criminal Law Week",

issn = "1368-5589",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comment: R v Jones (William Francis) [2020] EWCA Crim 1021

AU - Wortley, Natalie

PY - 2020/9/21

Y1 - 2020/9/21

N2 - Discusses whether evidence that DNA matching that of the defendant was found on a moveable object is sufficient to establish a case to answer. Highlights the court's observations about the way in which experts should frame their conclusions.

AB - Discusses whether evidence that DNA matching that of the defendant was found on a moveable object is sufficient to establish a case to answer. Highlights the court's observations about the way in which experts should frame their conclusions.

KW - expert evidence

KW - DNA evidence

KW - secondary transfer

M3 - Article

SN - 1368-5589

VL - 2020

JO - Criminal Law Week

JF - Criminal Law Week

ER -