Commentary on Hak. Evaluation of the Forensic Science Regulator's recommendations regarding image comparison evidence

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

5 Citations (Scopus)

48 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	298-301
Number of pages	4
Journal	Forensic Science International: Synergy
Volume	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.09.006
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2019

Access to Document

@article{c5eeb410eb7e4c5cac8060e93ebf1bc2,

title = "Commentary on Hak. Evaluation of the Forensic Science Regulator's recommendations regarding image comparison evidence",

author = "Gillian Tully and Michael Stockdale",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.09.006",

language = "English",

volume = "1",

pages = "298--301",

journal = "Forensic Science International: Synergy",

issn = "2589-871X",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary on Hak. Evaluation of the Forensic Science Regulator's recommendations regarding image comparison evidence

AU - Tully, Gillian

AU - Stockdale, Michael

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85074668984

U2 - 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.09.006

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 2589-871X

VL - 1

SP - 298

EP - 301

JO - Forensic Science International: Synergy

JF - Forensic Science International: Synergy

ER -