Comparative review of methods for handling drop-out in longitudinal studies

Pete Philipson, Weang Kee Ho, Robin Henderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Longitudinal data analysis is frequently complicated by drop-out. In this paper we consider several methods for dealing with drop-out afflicted data. Along with a general comparison, particular attention is paid to the consequences of model misspecification. The purpose of our approach is two-fold. We first deliberate the form of the drop-out model and compare two alternatives. Furthermore, the extent to which each method is dependent on its core assumptions is assessed through scenarios where one or more such assumptions are compromised. Second, the extent to which we can identify adequacy of model fit is investigated via recently developed diagnostics. These twin targets are pursued via simulation scenarios and application to a schizophrenia trial of over 500 patients with near 50 per cent drop-out.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6276-6298
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume27
Issue number30
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Dec 2008

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative review of methods for handling drop-out in longitudinal studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this