Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing perspectives of volunteers and patients on the Health Champions intervention in secondary mental healthcare: a qualitative study

Mariana Pinto da Costa*, Wen Ching Andrea Chang, Yuxin Wu, Scarlett Spence, Hyeon J. Cho, Raymond Mcgrath, Euan Sadler, Gracie Tredget, Isobel Mdudu, Fiona Gaughran, Nick Sevdalis, Ioannis Bakolis, Julie Williams

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background People with serious mental illness (SMI) can experience significant physical health challenges. The Health Champions intervention was developed to support their physical health through using trained volunteers. However, volunteer and patient perspectives on the impact and implementation of this intervention have yet to be understood.Aims To compare the views of patients and volunteers on the Health Champions intervention.Design and setting A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on interviews with 29 study participants. Interviews were carried out either face-to-face, via Microsoft Teams, or by telephone and included 12 patients (6 men and 6 women) and 17 volunteers (the Health Champions) (5 men and 12 women).Results Four overarching themes were identified, highlighting both similarities and differences between stakeholders’ perspectives: (1) supporting goal setting; (2) impact on positive lifestyle; (3) experiences and perception of the programme and (4) navigating challenges during the programme. Both groups found the programme to be largely successful, by motivating patients to work towards their physical health goals and facilitating successful matching of patients with volunteers. Volunteers and patients valued good communication with the research team. Though both groups shared some views on the challenges with scheduling and a lack of face-to-face contact during the COVID-19 pandemic, their perceptions on how patients incorporated their health changes during and after the programme, as well as other administrative concerns such as views on the efficacy of journaling and breakdown of roles, differed.Conclusions The Health Champions intervention was perceived as useful to improve the physical health of patients with SMI. Differences in the views between the two stakeholders may result from their distinct experiences and expectations. Future volunteering programmes should further support the diverse physical health needs of patients with SMI.Data sharing is not applicable as no data sets were generated and/or analysed for this study.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere110760
Number of pages12
JournalBMJ Open
Volume16
Issue number2
Early online date5 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2026

Keywords

  • Adult
  • COVID-19/epidemiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Male
  • Mental Disorders/therapy
  • Mental Health Services
  • Middle Aged
  • Qualitative Research
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Volunteers/psychology
  • Clinical Trial
  • Health
  • Exercise
  • Physical Fitness
  • Behavior
  • Capacity Building

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing perspectives of volunteers and patients on the Health Champions intervention in secondary mental healthcare: a qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this