Comparing Transnational Legal Orders: Criminalisation, Labour Law and Forced Labour

Shahrzad Fouladvand, Tony Ward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Two transnational legal regimes aim to counter some of the most severe forms of labour exploitation: one centred on the Palermo Protocol supplemented to the UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime (UNTOC) and the other on the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Conventions. This article focuses on the relationship between transnational criminal law (TCL) and transnational labour law (TLL) and their effectiveness in tackling labour exploitation. Criminalisation and labour regulation have been seen as competing ‘paradigms’ in tackling human trafficking and modern slavery. TCL has been effective in diffusing criminal law norms around the world, but the modest number of resulting prosecutions can do little tackle the huge global market in forced or severely exploited labour. TLL, with its more decentralised and pluralistic structure, offers greater hope of achieving some alleviation of labour exploitation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-50
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of International and Comparative Law
Volume9
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Convention against Transnational Organized Crime
  • forced labour
  • human trafficking
  • International Labour Organization (ILO)
  • Palermo Protocol
  • transnational labour law
  • modern slavery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Transnational Legal Orders: Criminalisation, Labour Law and Forced Labour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this