Abstract
Recent years have witnessed a considerable extension in the defined activities covered by the CCT regime in UK local government. While the 1980 saw CCT applied to mainly manual services (such as refuse collection), the 1990 have witnessed the spread of compulsory competition into white-collar professions and services such as Housing Management. Recent accounts of CCT have tended to assess its overall impact within a framework that is mainly informed by the emphasis on how the management of local public services will benefit from the contemporary introduction of Competition and Quasi-Markets. While CCT has clearly had some important managerial implications, this article argues that its more important political impact has been to intensify central control and regulation in order to restructure the local welfare state. In this sense, the vocabulary of the market has served to camouflage a process of centralisation which is characteristic both of New Right ideology and more traditional concerns within the UK political system.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 63-75 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Public Policy and Administration |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 1995 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Compulsory competition for local Government services in the UK: A case of market rhetoric and camouflaged centralism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver