Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review

Pim Cuijpers, Isaac Marks, Annemieke van Straten, Kate Cavanagh, Lina Gega, Gerhard Andersson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    302 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Computer‐aided psychotherapy (CP) is said to (1) be as effective as face‐to‐face psychotherapy, while requiring less therapist time, for anxiety disorder sufferers, (2) speed access to care, and (3) save traveling time. CP may be delivered on stand‐alone or Internet‐linked computers, palmtop computers, phone‐interactive voice response, DVDs, and cell phones. The authors performed a meta‐analysis of 23 randomised controlled studies (RCTs) that compared CP with non‐CP in anxiety disorders: phobias, n = 10; panic disorder/agoraphobia, n = 9; PTSD, n = 3; obsessive–compulsive disorder, n = 1. Overall mean effect size of CP compared with non‐CP was 1.08 (95% confidence interval: 0.84–1.32). CP and face‐to‐face psychotherapy did not differ significantly from each other (13 comparisons, d = −0.06). Much caution is needed when interpreting the findings indicating that outcome was unrelated to type of disorder, type of comparison group, mode of CP delivery (Internet, stand‐alone PC, palmtop), and recency of the CP system and that effect size decreased when more therapist time was replaced by the computer. Because CP as a whole was as effective as face‐to‐face psychotherapy, certain forms of CP deserve to be integrated into routine practice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)66-82
    JournalCognitive Behaviour Therapy
    Volume38
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this