Abstract
Explores the circumstances in which the making of an application for a confiscation order might amount to an abuse of process entitling the court to grant a stay of proceedings. Outlines the facts leading to the Court of Appeal decision in R. (on the application of BERR) v Lowe and reviews the case law referred to by the Court of Appeal. Highlights other cases decided subsequent to Lowe.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 39-45 |
Journal | The Company Lawyer |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Process (Law)