Abstract
Explores the circumstances in which the making of an application for a confiscation order might amount to an abuse of process entitling the court to grant a stay of proceedings. Outlines the facts leading to the Court of Appeal decision in R. (on the application of BERR) v Lowe and reviews the case law referred to by the Court of Appeal. Highlights other cases decided subsequent to Lowe.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 39-45 |
| Journal | The Company Lawyer |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Process (Law)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Confiscation orders and abuse of process: discretion to prevent "double whammy" under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver