TY - JOUR
T1 - Connectivity and complex systems
T2 - learning from a multi-disciplinary perspective
AU - Turnbull, Laura
AU - Hütt, Marc Thorsten
AU - Ioannides, Andreas A.
AU - Kininmonth, Stuart
AU - Poeppl, Ronald
AU - Tockner, Klement
AU - Bracken, Louise J.
AU - Keesstra, Saskia
AU - Liu, Lichan
AU - Masselink, Rens
AU - Parsons, Anthony J.
N1 - Funding information: We are grateful for support received from the EU COST action 1306 which facilitated interdisciplinary discussions. We would also like to acknowledge the helpful criticism and suggestions made by two anonymous reviewers that have substantially improved this paper. Workshops that led to the submission of this manuscript were funded by the EU Cost Action ES1306 on “Connecting European connectivity research”. All data referred to in this paper have been cited accordingly.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - In recent years, parallel developments in disparate disciplines have focused on what has come to be termed connectivity; a concept used in understanding and describing complex systems. Conceptualisations and operationalisations of connectivity have evolved largely within their disciplinary boundaries, yet similarities in this concept and its application among disciplines are evident. However, any implementation of the concept of connectivity carries with it both ontological and epistemological constraints, which leads us to ask if there is one type or set of approach(es) to connectivity that might be applied to all disciplines. In this review we explore four ontological and epistemological challenges in using connectivity to understand complex systems from the standpoint of widely different disciplines. These are: (i) defining the fundamental unit for the study of connectivity; (ii) separating structural connectivity from functional connectivity; (iii) understanding emergent behaviour; and (iv) measuring connectivity. We draw upon discipline-specific insights from Computational Neuroscience, Ecology, Geomorphology, Neuroscience, Social Network Science and Systems Biology to explore the use of connectivity among these disciplines. We evaluate how a connectivity-based approach has generated new understanding of structural-functional relationships that characterise complex systems and propose a ‘common toolbox’ underpinned by network-based approaches that can advance connectivity studies by overcoming existing constraints.
AB - In recent years, parallel developments in disparate disciplines have focused on what has come to be termed connectivity; a concept used in understanding and describing complex systems. Conceptualisations and operationalisations of connectivity have evolved largely within their disciplinary boundaries, yet similarities in this concept and its application among disciplines are evident. However, any implementation of the concept of connectivity carries with it both ontological and epistemological constraints, which leads us to ask if there is one type or set of approach(es) to connectivity that might be applied to all disciplines. In this review we explore four ontological and epistemological challenges in using connectivity to understand complex systems from the standpoint of widely different disciplines. These are: (i) defining the fundamental unit for the study of connectivity; (ii) separating structural connectivity from functional connectivity; (iii) understanding emergent behaviour; and (iv) measuring connectivity. We draw upon discipline-specific insights from Computational Neuroscience, Ecology, Geomorphology, Neuroscience, Social Network Science and Systems Biology to explore the use of connectivity among these disciplines. We evaluate how a connectivity-based approach has generated new understanding of structural-functional relationships that characterise complex systems and propose a ‘common toolbox’ underpinned by network-based approaches that can advance connectivity studies by overcoming existing constraints.
KW - Connectivity Studies
KW - Emergent Behaviour
KW - Functional Connectivity
KW - Fundamental Unit
KW - Measuring Connectivity
KW - Structural Connectivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054461115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s41109-018-0067-2
DO - 10.1007/s41109-018-0067-2
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85054461115
SN - 2364-8228
VL - 3
JO - Applied Network Science
JF - Applied Network Science
IS - 1
M1 - 11
ER -