TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus on exercise reporting template (Cert)
T2 - Modified delphi study
AU - Slade, Susan C.
AU - Dionne, Clermont E.
AU - Underwood, Martin
AU - Buchbinder, Rachelle
AU - Beck, Belinda
AU - Bennell, Kim
AU - Brosseau, Lucie
AU - Costa, Leonardo
AU - Cramp, Fiona
AU - Cup, Edith
AU - Feehan, Lynne
AU - Ferreira, Manuela
AU - Forbes, Scott
AU - Glasziou, Paul
AU - Habets, Bas
AU - Harris, Susan
AU - Hay-Smith, Jean
AU - Hillier, Susan
AU - Hinman, Rana
AU - Holland, Ann
AU - Hondras, Maria
AU - Kelly, George
AU - Kent, Peter
AU - Lauret, Gert Jan
AU - Long, Audrey
AU - Maher, Chris
AU - Morso, Lars
AU - Osteras, Nina
AU - Petersen, Tom
AU - Quinlivan, Ros
AU - Rees, Karen
AU - Regnaux, Jean Philippe
AU - Rietberg, Marc
AU - Saunders, Dave
AU - Skoetz, Nicole
AU - Sogaard, Karen
AU - Takken, Tim
AU - Van Tulder, Maurits
AU - Voet, Nicoline
AU - Ward, Lesley
AU - White, Claire
N1 - Funding Information:
This research project was funded by Arthritis Australia (Philip Benjamin, Grant No: 2014GIA03). Professor Buchbinder is funded by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Senior Principal Research Fellowship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Physical Therapy Association.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Background: Exercise interventions are often incompletely described in reports of clinical trials, hampering evaluation of results and replication and implementation into practice. Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a standardized method for reporting exercise programs in clinical trials: the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT). Design and Methods: Using the EQUATOR Network’s methodological framework, 137 exercise experts were invited to participate in a Delphi consensus study. A list of 41 items was identified from a meta-epidemiologic study of 73 systematic reviews of exercise. For each item, participants indicated agreement on an 11-point rating scale. Consensus for item inclusion was defined a priori as greater than 70% agreement of respondents rating an item 7 or above. Three sequential rounds of anonymous online questionnaires and a Delphi workshop were used. Results: There were 57 (response rate=42%), 54 (response rate=95%), and 49 (response rate=91%) respondents to rounds 1 through 3, respectively, from 11 countries and a range of disciplines. In round 1, 2 items were excluded; 24 items reached consensus for inclusion (8 items accepted in original format), and 16 items were revised in response to participant suggestions. Of 14 items in round 2, 3 were excluded, 11 reached consensus for inclusion (4 items accepted in original format), and 7 were reworded. Sixteen items were included in round 3, and all items reached greater than 70% consensus for inclusion. Limitations: The views of included Delphi panelists may differ from those of experts who declined participation and may not fully represent the views of all exercise experts. Conclusions: The CERT, a 16-item checklist developed by an international panel of exercise experts, is designed to improve the reporting of exercise programs in all evaluative study designs and contains 7 categories: materials, provider, delivery, location, dosage, tailoring, and compliance. The CERT will encourage transparency, improve trial interpretation and replication, and facilitate implementation of effective exercise interventions into practice.
AB - Background: Exercise interventions are often incompletely described in reports of clinical trials, hampering evaluation of results and replication and implementation into practice. Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a standardized method for reporting exercise programs in clinical trials: the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT). Design and Methods: Using the EQUATOR Network’s methodological framework, 137 exercise experts were invited to participate in a Delphi consensus study. A list of 41 items was identified from a meta-epidemiologic study of 73 systematic reviews of exercise. For each item, participants indicated agreement on an 11-point rating scale. Consensus for item inclusion was defined a priori as greater than 70% agreement of respondents rating an item 7 or above. Three sequential rounds of anonymous online questionnaires and a Delphi workshop were used. Results: There were 57 (response rate=42%), 54 (response rate=95%), and 49 (response rate=91%) respondents to rounds 1 through 3, respectively, from 11 countries and a range of disciplines. In round 1, 2 items were excluded; 24 items reached consensus for inclusion (8 items accepted in original format), and 16 items were revised in response to participant suggestions. Of 14 items in round 2, 3 were excluded, 11 reached consensus for inclusion (4 items accepted in original format), and 7 were reworded. Sixteen items were included in round 3, and all items reached greater than 70% consensus for inclusion. Limitations: The views of included Delphi panelists may differ from those of experts who declined participation and may not fully represent the views of all exercise experts. Conclusions: The CERT, a 16-item checklist developed by an international panel of exercise experts, is designed to improve the reporting of exercise programs in all evaluative study designs and contains 7 categories: materials, provider, delivery, location, dosage, tailoring, and compliance. The CERT will encourage transparency, improve trial interpretation and replication, and facilitate implementation of effective exercise interventions into practice.
KW - exercise
KW - Delphi study
KW - concensus
KW - reporting guidelines
KW - publication quality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989844933&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2522/ptj.20150668
DO - 10.2522/ptj.20150668
M3 - Article
C2 - 27149962
AN - SCOPUS:84989844933
SN - 0031-9023
VL - 96
SP - 1514
EP - 1524
JO - Physical Therapy
JF - Physical Therapy
IS - 10
ER -