Abstract
We discuss the problem of random measurement error in two variables when using a cross-lagged panel design. We apply the problem to the question of the causal direction between socio-economic status and subjective health, known also as health selection versus social causation. We plot the bias of the ratio between the social causation and the health selection coefficient as a function of the degree of measurement error in subjective health and socio-economic status for different scenarios which might occur in practice. Using simulated data we give an example of a Bayesian model for the treatment of measurement error that relies on external information about the degree of measurement error.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 607-628 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society |
| Volume | 179 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 15 Sept 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Bias
- Cross-lagged panel design
- Health selection
- Integrated nested Laplace approximation
- Measurement error
- Social causation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Consequences of measurement error for inference in cross-lagged panel design-the example of the reciprocal causal relationship between subjective health and socio-economic status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver