Abstract
This paper assesses the credentials of the planning system in dealing with low-impact developments in the countryside. Forming part of the wider debate on sustainable development in the UK, low-impact developments challenge contemporary rural planning orthodoxy. A detailed case study of Brithdir Mawr in Pembrokeshire Coast National Park reveals the complexities and sensitivities inherent in operationalizing sustainability in this context. The results reveal a planning system reluctant to embrace unconventional lifestyles and methods claiming to be sustainable. It is concluded that the planning system and low-impact developments both need to demonstrate their sustainability credentials in a more direct and empirical manner. Ultimately this could be built into revised criteria for allowing dwellings in the open countryside.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 273-287 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2001 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
Keywords
- Lack of empiricism
- Low-impact development
- Planning reform
- Sustainability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Contesting sustainable development: Low-impact development in Pembrokeshire Coast National Park'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver