Counting sleep? Critical reflections on a UK national sleep strategy

Robert Meadows*, Sarah Nettleton, Christine Hine, Jason Ellis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The United Kingdom Government are planning to issue guidance on sleep duration. Whilst sleep is clearly important for health, offering such guidance is not the answer. Within this commentary we put forward three arguments to support this claim: (i) sleep is liminal and beyond the limits of voluntary agency; (ii) sleep is linked to structural inequality; and (iii) sleep is multiple. The first two points are now well established. However, the third encourages a considerable break from established thinking. Recent research has highlighted that we need to move away from viewing sleep as a singular, objectively defined phenomenon, and instead position it as many different practices woven together. Sleep is situated, contingent and is enacted in multiple ways. Public health would be better served by a ground-up approach which explores good and poor sleep across these three axes: liminality, social position, and ontology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)494-499
Number of pages6
JournalCritical Public Health
Volume31
Issue number4
Early online date27 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Counting sleep? Critical reflections on a UK national sleep strategy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this