Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to offer a critical review of the work of Tom Peters. Design/methodology/approach - Notes a degree of narrative experimentation in the works of Tom Peters. Offers a narrative typology to describe this narrative change, suggests a number of reasons for this narrative experimentation and outlines topics for future research in this area. Findings: The paper suggests that Peters' narrative experimentation reflects twin frustrations. Namely Peters' frustration with the short-term orientations and innate conservatism of the US business elite and peripheralization in Corporate America. Originality/value: The paper proposes an original narrative typology for the examination of Peters' work and suggests directions for future research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 658-673 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Management Decision |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Business excellence
- Management gurus
- Narratives
- Quality management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Crazy days call for crazy ways? Narrating Tom Peters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver