Abstract
Meta-analysis has proved increasingly popular in management and organization studies as a way of combining existing empirical quantitative research to generate a statistical estimate of how strongly variables are associated. Whilst a number of studies identify technical, procedural and practical limitations of meta-analyses, none have yet tackled the meta-theoretical flaws in this approach. We deploy critical realist meta-theory to argue that the individual quantitative studies, upon which meta-analysis relies, lack explanatory power because they are rooted in quasi-empiricist meta-theory. This problem, we argue, is carried over in meta-analyses. We then propose a ‘critical realist synthesis’ as a potential alternative to the use of meta-analysis in organization studies and social science more widely.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 11-39 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Human Relations |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 11 Nov 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Critical Essay: Meta-analysis: A critical realist critique and alternative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver